The basketball world is convinced that the bribery scandal engulfing college basketball comes down to paying players
To many, the root of this issue is the NCAA's amateurism laws that state college athletes cannot be paid. ESPN's Jay Bilas, a noted advocate for paying college athletes, argued:"When have you ever heard of a coach being steered to an agent? That pesky free market works incredibly well & efficiently for everyone else; it is foolish to assert that it would not work just as well for college athletes." New York Knicks forward Michael Beasley also argued that college athletes ought be paid. Opponents of paying college athletes believe that athletes receiving scholarships, free education, nutritional care, & sometimes stipends, is compensation enough.Corruption scandal threatens eligibility for college basketball players
according to RALEIGH, N.C. (AP) — The federal fraud & bribery scandal that has shaken college basketball has left a key lingering question of what will happen to recruits who received money related to attending certain schools. It can mean the permanent loss of college eligibility for some players, for assaulting a core NCAA rule prohibiting improper benefits. But some players can go through the reinstatement process & eventually play after sitting out some games on a case-by-case basis. He tells athletes involved will "have that stigma" attached to the scandal. Federal claimants reported Tuesday that ten men — including four helper coaches — have been charged by using hundreds of thousands of dollars in bribes to influence star athletes' choice of schools, shoe sponsors & agents.This content may collect you by Max Nolan
Post a Comment